La segunda reacción internacional significativa, en el New York Times (21.02.05), insiste en el desencanto, la insignificancia y el carácter pasablemente incomprensible para un lector de la Constitución de los EE.U.

En estos términos:

But some political experts say that decisions on the Constitution are likely to be determined by the internal politics of each nation, and that the lessons from Spain’s experience may have little relevance elsewhere.
In Spain, by contrast, Mr. Zapatero had to defend the Constitution against claims that it is too narrow in scope. «Those who oppose the Constitution here say they want more Europe or a different Europe,» said José Ignacio Torreblanca, a political analyst at the Royal Elcano Institute, a research organization in Madrid that focuses on international affairs. Few Spaniards favor a weaker Constitution, he added.
(..)
The differing interpretations among member states reflect not only the diversity of their political climates but also the fact that the Constitution is a complicated document that lends itself to a variety of readings.
Rather than simply lay out broad principles underlying the proposed system of government, the document delves into the details of arcane policy matters, Mr. Torreblanca said. «Can you imagine the Constitution of the United States discussing a common fishing policy?» he asked.